isn't quite ashamed enough to present

jr conlin's ink stained banana

2007-04-30

::Changing My Title

i start my new job today, and i'm really looking forward to that. (Granted, i'm going to be spending the first few weeks drudging through a few systems, but i'm even excited to do that. i lead a sad, sad life.)

Still, i'm no longer doing something i did for roughly eight years. My previous Official Unofficial title has been "Infinite Monkey Wrangler". This was because i dealt with handling incoming data from various external businesses that wanted their stuff on our system. They're smart folks. They sell cars, run hotels and keep ships running, so it's completely understandable that they may not be aware of why putting an unescaped "&" in an XML feed. So my job was to make sure that our stuff was smart and flexible enough to handle whatever they wanted to post and it just works.

As one person astutely noted, it was like that old sage about "If you put an infinite number of monkeys in front of an infinite number of typewriters, one would produce Shakespear". i got to handle the rest.

Heck, that's one of the reasons this blog is called "The Ink-Stained Banana".

Still, time (and monkeys) march on and now i'm not doing that quite as much.

So instead i'm starting to think that i should change my title. Lately, it seems like my role is more pointing out the obvious. You know, things like "Uhm, i don't think that'd work because you kinda need to have power." or "Why don't you just ask them instead of try and guess?" or other like things.

i'm starting to think that perhaps my role has changed, and that i'm fulfilling rule 12.

i'm thinking of becoming the first "Corporate five-year old".

Hey, delicious user, Save This Page
2007-04-29

::Barbeque'd Bridge

Back in the 90's i lived in Virginia. In the span of a couple of years there were two accidents where a loaded gas tanker crashed beneath an overpass. i remember these pretty well because i drove over and under these every day, including that day.

Let me again point that out.

i drove both those sections even after they'd had a full tanker of gasoline burn beneath them. The Virginia Department of Highways inspected the bridge joins and determined that while there was significant heating from the incident (gosh really?) there was no significant structural damage. The sections were cleaned and repainted a few months later and i believe one beam had a re-enforcement plate welded onto it a year later.

These were major roads, by the way. One was half of a six lane overpass, the other was part of a fly-over ramp from Malfunction Junction in Springfield (the latter was eventually removed as part of a general fix-up of that nightmare, but that's beside the point.) i'll even note that these were not recently retrofitted to prevent for major earthquake damage.

So why the hell did that ramp in Oakland fail?

Some structural engineer or contracting company gots some 'splainin' to do …

Ok, looking at the span that failed, i'm willing to cut a bit of slack, but just barely. Unlike the Braddock Rd overpass that i remember being 'qued, this was a structure being supported by a single post. More than sufficient for most things like general support or even lateral movement in an earthquake, not so good for things like uneven thermal dynamics. In that situation, it's not a case of it melting or burning, it's a case where part of the structure heats more than another and the supports fail. Hmm… that sounds familiar…

Still, the reason i'm not really willing to give a complete break is because support pillar in question is way too small.

callous
2007-04-29 - 19:42:02

Bah, typical East Bay Commuter issues.

One wonders if "survives a tanker truck's worth of gas burning" is on the spec. Sure, on an overpass, who really cares? Take an alternate route. I'm a little more concerned about, say the lower deck of the Bay Bridge.

Well, ok, not that concerned, because we could really do without all of the traffic that crosses it.

Anyway, if it were actually in the spec I suspect all such open-steel overpasses would be coated with the spray-on insulation they use in commercial steel fabrications.


jrconlin
2007-04-29 - 20:03:37

Well, that's one of the things that confused me about this one. Back east, bridges and overpasses were pretty much concrete with steel underpinnings (Usually just enough steel to hold up the concrete.) They also had pretty sizable foundation points, something I don't see a lot of out here. I'm sure there's a valid explanation for that, but I get the feeling it involves dollar signs.


rr
2007-04-29 - 22:01:29

Were the other bridges entirely reinforced concrete? This 1950s roadway has unprotected steel girders underneath as the support. A modern concrete structure probably would've faired better.


jrconlin
2007-04-29 - 22:05:32

Hmm… The ones I remember also were unprotected girders beneath (big honking girders, but girders none the less) but you do raise a good point about the reinforcements. It may well be that the rebar inside had degraded enough to cause the failure. For some strange reason I though these spans had been replaced after the quake.


rr
2007-04-29 - 22:10:47

Guess I should refresh next time before restating the obvious …


Josh
2007-04-30 - 11:52:24

It's amazing that the driver wasn't hurt more seriously — no, I'm not surprised he got out of the rig with only 2nd degree burns. What surprises me is that he walked 10 blocks in Oakland in the middle of the night and wasn't jumped by hoodlums ;)


justin
2007-04-30 - 12:51:30

I can't wait til we make the jump hydrogen-fueled cars, and deadly explosions never happen again ever.


jrconlin
2007-04-30 - 13:26:22

Not me, I want a really safe vehicle. That's why I'm having one be built out of pure sodium. Oh sure, carwashes and rainstorms might be more entertaining…


Hey, delicious user, Save This Page

::The Neighbor's Dog

[Stuff removed]

i'm getting guilt trips about someone else's dog.

i'm pathetic.

Ok, they had a REALLY good excuse for being away and i feel like a supreme idiot. Still, i let them know that (God Forbid) this ever happen again, just let me know and i'll make sure that the pup's taken care of.
Hey, delicious user, Save This Page
2007-04-28

::The New Box!

Yesterday, the new box arrived. Well, most of it at least. In two boxes.

Needless to say, i was a bit confused.

Then i opened the box.

sspx0075.jpg

Yep, i get to keep my geek cred (well, some of it at least) and now i know why it was so cheap. So, into the living room, out with the socket screwdriver and on with the latex gloves (they kill static far better than a strap does). Two hours later, the box was mostly built. It's still missing a hard disk, but it's got a CD/DVD player, so it's good enough to run a burn program for a few hours. Actually, i had to run a pair of burn in programs (Dual core, don'cha'know.)

Once i was reasonably confident that the machine wasn't going to catch fire (about 10 hours and never crossed 35°C, half of it's critical operating range) i felt fairly confident that i could move the old drives into the new box and set things up.

Let me take a moment there to let that sink in.

Previously, when i got my windows box, changing computers took several days, most of which consisted of moving data from old drives to new drives, reconfiguring stuff, reinstalling software, and otherwise convincing the machine to do what i told it to.

With my server, it involved me moving the disks from one box to another, and updating ifconfig to use the new network device.

As much as i say that linux is still not ready for the masses, By the Sacred Ghost of James Thurber, i wish it was.

Hetta
2007-04-29 - 21:29:50

Latex gloves, you say? I've made do with touching the kitchen sink every now and then … (or a central heating radiator.)


jrconlin
2007-04-29 - 22:07:06

I've learned to be rather paranoid. I once cooked a $5000 graphics card by thinking I was properly grounded. I know one guy that runs a static strap to his ankle, but that seems oddly restrictive. I like the gloves because they work as advertised and I don't have to worry about building up static I don't know about.


Hey, delicious user, Save This Page
2007-04-27

::That Ain't Cherry

Ooh, break room snacks! There's cookies and crackers and, mmm those shrimp flavored poppers. Ooh, and a big jar full of those brightly wrapped little candies! i love those! They've got such intense flavors and the foil is pretty and … remind you of cat food.

Hey, delicious user, Save This Page
Blogs of note
personal that's my blog
(The Official Blog of the Internet)
memoirs of hydrogen guy matthew shepherd (quebec) rhapsodic.org j$ (right) Henriette's Herbal Blog fanatical apathy lynne ydw i iconophobia slumbering lungfish
geek Y!Cool Thing michael j radwin jeremy z
(The Official Website of the Internet)
dave's picks ultramookie Josh Woodward derek balling j$ (left) simon willison Yahoo! Search Blog
news ars technica search engine watch webmaster world.com
forums uh.net man-man killroy & tina

experimental

Firefox search plugins for Yahoo!

My Living Room media box config

The Official "Official" Registry of the Internet

Powered by WordPress
Hosted on Dreamhost.
And Steveo's page is Totally Fucking Awsome.